What would a World Cup style college football playoff look like?

Where will Ohio State be headed? - Clive Mason

The World Cup format is fun and exciting. What would it look like if we did one for college football?

I admit: I'm not a huge soccer fan most of the time. Like millions of other Americans though, I hop on the bandwagon once every four year, especially since I'm a Brazilian citizen, and have precious few other opportunities to share any kind of connection to the homeland of my mother. For the next few weeks, I'll yell and cheer for the guys in yellow, perhaps to the chagrin of my coworkers.

The World Cup playoff format, pods and all, is different from just about everything we typically use here in the states, but that doesn't mean it isn't awesome. Our friends are Reddit recently drew up what the NCAA basketball tournament might have looked like had they used the system, and it's pretty cool, even though, geez, would Ohio State have even advanced out of that group? Probably not.

Seeing that, of course, got me thinking. Last year, we brainstormed about what a bunch of different playoff brackets might look like, from four teams to 32. What would a college football playoff look like if we used World Cup style pods?

As it turns out, the good folks at Team Speed Kills took a whack at this idea a few years ago. But in the true spirit of the World Cup, perhaps a more unwieldy, more expansive bracket might be a little more...fun, right? Let's take a crack at what that might look like.

First, a huge caveat. We're looking at building a 32 team playoff that will involve multiple games. This is not practical. This is not going to happen. If you look at this scenario and start wondering about who is going to host what game, or how this fits in with the calendar of the regular college football season, you're missing the point. This is merely a thought exercise. Let's take the 2013 results, pretend this is happening over the summer, and we're not constrained by pesky things like logistics or travel time.

One of the cool things about the World Cup is that technically, virtually any country on Earth could theoretically be a part of it. Even places that Carmen Sandiego might suspect aren't actually real, like Moldova, or the Faroe Islands, participate in qualifying. To capture that spirit, let's throw the doors of the College Football World Cup open to comers outside of the FBS ranks. North Dakota State, Eastern Washington and Eastern Illinois all beat bowl teams from last season. Let's make that their qualifying win. Congrats! Against all odds, you made the completely pretend College Football World Cup.

To pick the teams, let's start with folks who actually won something last year. Let's give every FBS conference champion an automatic bid to the World Cup, as well as the top eight FCS conference champs. That means UCF (American), Florida State (ACC), Baylor (Big 12), Michigan State (Big Ten), Rice (CUSA), Bowling Green (MAC), Fresno State (MWC), Stanford (Pac-12), Auburn (SEC) and Louisiana-Lafayette (Sun Belt) get auto bids from the FBS. That's 10 bids, or 13 bids total.

It's probably fair to give an extra at large bid to teams that won a divisional championship as well. So Duke (ACC-Coastal), Ohio State (Big Ten-Whatever), Arizona State (Pac-12-South) and Missouri (SEC-East) all get bids, along with Marshall (CUSA), Utah State (MWC) and Northern Illinois (MAC). That gives us 20 spots total. We need 12 more.

The real World Cup incorporates some questionable ranking mechanisms, so let's go with that. When I think of questionable ranking tools, I think of the BCS, so let's go down the 2013 list and grab the top 12 teams that didn't otherwise get a bid. That gives us Alabama, South Carolina, Oregon, Oklahoma, Clemson, Oklahoma State, LSU, UCLA, Louisville, Wisconsin, Texas A&M and Georgia. USC is the first team out, and quite frankly, y'all have no reason to complain, Trojan fans.

So that's our 32 teams. Next, we need to seed them into groups. Again, let's go ahead and use the BCS rankings here.

POT 1

Florida State, Auburn, Alabama, Michigan State, Stanford, Baylor, Ohio State, Missouri

POT 2

South Carolina, Oregon, Oklahoma, Clemson, Oklahoma State, Arizona State, UCF, LSU

POT 3

UCLA, Duke, Louisville, Fresno State, Wisconsin, Texas A&M, Georgia, Northern Illinois

POT 4

Bowling Green, Utah State, Louisiana-Lafayette, Rice, Marshall, North Dakota State, Eastern Washington, Eastern Illinois

Now, the tricky part: the groups. Like the World Cup, I slotted the Pot 1 groups in order (FSU to Group A, Auburn to Group B, etc), and then used a random number generator to determine which teams in the other three pots would join them. I admit, I cheated a little to make sure that the Pot 1 and Pot 2 teams weren't from the same conference. This is what I came up with:

Group A

Florida State, LSU, UCLA, Eastern Washington

Group B

Auburn, Oregon, Duke, North Dakota State

Group C

Alabama, Arizona State, Wisconsin, Eastern Illinois

Group D

Michigan State, Clemson, Texas A&M, Rice

Group E

Stanford, Oklahoma, Fresno State, Utah State

Group F

Baylor, South Carolina, Georgia, Louisiana-Lafayette

Group G

Ohio State, UCF, Louisville, Marshall

Group H

Missouri, Oklahoma State, Northern Illinois, Bowling Green

Sure, cry bias all you want, but it looks like Ohio State caught the lucky group, while Group D and Group A look like absolute killers, and North Dakota State will be hard pressed to work any magic in that tough group.

Now, it's time to figure out who actually advances. I fired up the simulator at WhatIfSports to get scores and everything. Let's give three points to the winner, and oh, a point if a team manages to lose in overtime. In the case of a tie in the standings, the advantage goes to who has the best point differential.  Also, an important disclaimer: WhatIfSports doesn't include FCS teams, so for simulation purposes, I swapped the FCS with their closest approximation using Sagarin rankings. It's horribly crude and unfair, but hey, you didn't think any of these three teams would actually advance, right?

Group A

Florida State: 51 LSU: 17

Florida State: 47 UCLA: 24

Florida State: 62 Eastern Washington: 3

LSU: 25 UCLA: 24

LSU: 27 Eastern Washington: 3

UCLA: 37 Eastern Washington: 34

Florida State wins the group, LSU advances. I was a little surprised how much Florida State dump trucked everybody, and how close Eastern Washington played  LSU and UCLA. Of course, I was plugging UTSA in the computer instead of EWU (their Sagarin ratings were almost identical).

Group B

Oregon: 41  Auburn: 7

Oregon: 51 Duke: 17

Oregon: 41 North Dakota State: 25

Auburn: 23 Duke: 16

Auburn: 37 North Dakota State: 24

Duke: 23 North Dakota State: 17

Oregon wins the group, Auburn advances

Group C

Alabama: 44 Arizona State: 31

Alabama: 40 Wisconsin: 21

Alabama: 38 Eastern Illinois: 7

Arizona State: 32 Wisconsin: 21

Arizona State: 41 Eastern Illinois: 30

Wisconsin: 28 Eastern Illinois: 10

Well, you had a good run FCS teams, but despite some close games, nobody was able to pull out a win. Arizona State beat Wisconsin without the help of #PAC12REFS. Alabama wins the group, ASU advances.

Group D

Michigan State: 27 Clemson: 6

Texas A&M: 36 Michigan State: 17

Michigan State: 33 Rice: 18

Rice: 31 Texas A&M 20

Clemson: 16 Texas A&M: 12

Clemson: 27 Rice: 23

What a wild group. I certainly didn't expect a Clemson/Rice game to factor critically into determining who comes out of it. Michigan State wins the group thanks to point differential, and Clemson advances.

Group E

Standford: 22 Oklahoma: 19

Fresno State: 38 Stanford: 27

Utah State: 29 Stanford: 26

Utah State: 44 Oklahoma: 20

Fresno State: 17 Utah State: 13

Fresno State: 40 Oklahoma: 37

Ok, finally some real madness. Fresno State wins the group, Utah State advances, and we all wonder just what the hell happened to Oklahoma. That team beat Bama, didn't they?

Group F

Baylor: 31 South Carolina: 19

Georgia: 44 Baylor: 42

Baylor: 79 Lousiana-Lafayette: 28

Georgia: 57 South Carolina: 39

Georgia: 51 Louisiana-Lafayette: 27

Louisiana-Lafayette: 23 South Carolina: 21

So, I assume this is in the land of make-believe where nobody on Georgia gets hurt, as they blow up the scoreboard to win the group. Also, in a world where Baylor thought they might need to advance on point differential, I can't be surprised that they nearly dropped 80 points on somebody. Baylor advances.

Group G

Ohio State: 35 UCF: 21

Louisville: 32 Ohio State: 30

Ohio State: 41 Marshall: 9

UCF: 24 Marshall: 21

Marshall: 34 Louisville: 30

Louisville: 50 UCF: 29

Ohio State barely wins the group thanks to point differential (+64 compared to +19), while Louisville advances.

Group H

Oklahoma State: 31 Missouri: 13

Oklahoma State: 51 Bowling Green: 35

Oklahoma State: 24 Northern Illinois: 7

Northern Illinois: 30 Missouri: 24

Bowling Green: 43 Northern Illinois: 31

Bowling Green: 45 Missouri: 35

Oklahoma State wins the group, Bowling Green advances, because reasons.

Now that group play is over, our 16 team bracket would look like this, after we follow the World Cup seeding format (1A vs 2B, etc)

Knockout Stage:

Screen_shot_2014-06-09_at_1.59.01_pm_medium

So, we get a rematch of the championship game in the first round knockout stage, amazing games between Alabama/Clemson and Oregon/LSU, a few sleeper games and...Ohio State/Bowling Green. Again. Not rigging the tournament. Promise.

Florida State: 45 Auburn: 24

Alabama: 47 Clemson: 10

Baylor: 63 Fresno State: 28

Ohio State: 34 Bowling Green: 22

LSU: 38 Oregon: 31

Arizona State: 30 Michigan State: 19

Louisville: 34 Oklahoma State: 20

Georgia: 23 Utah State: 17

Aww, the march of the underdog is over.

Quarterfinals:

Screen_shot_2014-06-09_at_2.18.19_pm_medium

Alabama: 41 Florida State: 31 (nobody tell #FSUTwitter)

Ohio State: 39 Baylor: 36

Arizona State: 26 LSU: 10

Georgia: 35 Louisville: 21

Okay, so maybe, in the spirit of the World Cup, this is a tiny bit rigged. Actually, I swear I'm not refreshing the page until Ohio State wins. Also, the World Cup means that we're either going to have Arizona State or Georgia in the championship game, just like we all predicted.

Semifinals:

Screen_shot_2014-06-09_at_2.23.46_pm_medium

Alabama: 25 Ohio State: 19

Georgia: 47 Arizona State: 26

Dammit, I spent the last two hours running random number generators, computer simulations, and this is the result I get? An All-SEC College Football World Cup final?

College Football World Cup Finals:

Screen_shot_2014-06-09_at_2.29.05_pm_medium

Wait, Georgia, a team beset by a biblical scale of injuries and bad luck, upset Alabama to win the World Cup?

Well, sure. Okay. Seems legit.

Here is your final bracket:

Screen_shot_2014-06-09_at_2.30.52_pm_medium

So, obviously, that's unrealistic and all, but what do you think? What changes would you make in the formula? How could we rig this to make sure Ohio State wins more often? Does this simulation mean that somebody crazy like Cameroon is going to win the actual World Cup?

X
Log In Sign Up

forgot?
Log In Sign Up

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior users will need to choose a permanent username, along with a new password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

I already have a Vox Media account!

Verify Vox Media account

Please login to your Vox Media account. This account will be linked to your previously existing Eater account.

Please choose a new SB Nation username and password

As part of the new SB Nation launch, prior MT authors will need to choose a new username and password.

Your username will be used to login to SB Nation going forward.

Forgot password?

We'll email you a reset link.

If you signed up using a 3rd party account like Facebook or Twitter, please login with it instead.

Forgot password?

Try another email?

Almost done,

By becoming a registered user, you are also agreeing to our Terms and confirming that you have read our Privacy Policy.

Join Land-Grant Holy Land

You must be a member of Land-Grant Holy Land to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Land-Grant Holy Land. You should read them.

Join Land-Grant Holy Land

You must be a member of Land-Grant Holy Land to participate.

We have our own Community Guidelines at Land-Grant Holy Land. You should read them.

Spinner.vc97ec6e

Authenticating

Great!

Choose an available username to complete sign up.

In order to provide our users with a better overall experience, we ask for more information from Facebook when using it to login so that we can learn more about our audience and provide you with the best possible experience. We do not store specific user data and the sharing of it is not required to login with Facebook.

tracking_pixel_9347_tracker